| Title |
Archaeogenetic study of prehistoric rice remains from Thailand and India: evidence of early japonica in South and Southeast Asia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, May 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12520-015-0236-5 |
| Authors |
Cristina Cobo Castillo, Katsunori Tanaka, Yo-Ichiro Sato, Ryuji Ishikawa, Bérénice Bellina, Charles Higham, Nigel Chang, Rabi Mohanty, Mukund Kajale, Dorian Q Fuller |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Philippines | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 58 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 28% |
| Researcher | 14 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 13% |
| Unknown | 8 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 32% |
| Arts and Humanities | 16 | 27% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 17% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 8% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 8 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2022.
All research outputs
#7,689,410
of 23,393,453 outputs
Outputs from Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences
#409
of 817 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,692
of 265,185 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences
#4
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,393,453 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 817 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,185 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.