| Title |
Impact of hysterectomy and bilateral oophorectomy prevalence on rates of cervical, uterine, and ovarian cancer among American Indian and Alaska Native women, 1999–2004
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cancer Causes & Control, October 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10552-011-9844-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Charlene A. Wong, Melissa A. Jim, Jessica King, Lillian Tom-Orme, Jeffrey A. Henderson, Mona Saraiya, Lisa C. Richardson, Larry Layne, Anil Suryaprasad, David K. Espey |
| Abstract |
To present more accurate incidence rates of cervical, uterine, and ovarian cancer by geographic region in American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) women. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 50% |
| Philippines | 2 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 50% |
| Scientists | 2 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 38 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 16% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 13% |
| Researcher | 5 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 11% |
| Other | 5 | 13% |
| Unknown | 8 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 24% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 8% |
| Psychology | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Unknown | 11 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2011.
All research outputs
#5,802,784
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Causes & Control
#699
of 2,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,058
of 138,783 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Causes & Control
#14
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,187 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 138,783 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.