↓ Skip to main content

Gluteal Tendinopathy: A Review of Mechanisms, Assessment and Management

Overview of attention for article published in Sports Medicine, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
10 news outlets
twitter
148 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
104 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
672 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Gluteal Tendinopathy: A Review of Mechanisms, Assessment and Management
Published in
Sports Medicine, May 2015
DOI 10.1007/s40279-015-0336-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alison Grimaldi, Rebecca Mellor, Paul Hodges, Kim Bennell, Henry Wajswelner, Bill Vicenzino

Abstract

Tendinopathy of the gluteus medius and gluteus minimus tendons is now recognized as a primary local source of lateral hip pain. The condition mostly occurs in mid-life both in athletes and in subjects who do not regularly exercise. Females are afflicted more than males. This condition interferes with sleep (side lying) and common weight-bearing tasks, which makes it a debilitating musculoskeletal condition with a significant impact. Mechanical loading drives the biological processes within a tendon and determines its structural form and load-bearing capacity. The combination of excessive compression and high tensile loads within tendons are thought to be most damaging. The available evidence suggests that joint position (particularly excessive hip adduction), together with muscle and bone elements, are key factors in gluteal tendinopathy. These factors provide a basis for a clinical reasoning process in the assessment and management of a patient presenting with localized lateral hip pain from gluteal tendinopathy. Currently, there is a lack of consensus as to which clinical examination tests provide best diagnostic utility. On the basis of the few diagnostic utility studies and the current understanding of the pathomechanics of gluteal tendinopathy, we propose that a battery of clinical tests utilizing a combination of provocative compressive and tensile loads is currently best practice in its assessment. Management of this condition commonly involves corticosteroid injection, exercise or shock wave therapy, with surgery reserved for recalcitrant cases. There is a dearth of evidence for any treatments, so the approach we recommend involves managing the load on the tendons through exercise and education on the underlying pathomechanics.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 148 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 672 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 665 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 121 18%
Student > Bachelor 101 15%
Other 69 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 45 7%
Researcher 41 6%
Other 111 17%
Unknown 184 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 189 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 168 25%
Sports and Recreations 56 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 2%
Neuroscience 7 1%
Other 25 4%
Unknown 212 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 171. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2022.
All research outputs
#241,878
of 25,758,211 outputs
Outputs from Sports Medicine
#223
of 2,897 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,471
of 279,971 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sports Medicine
#4
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,758,211 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,897 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 57.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,971 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.