↓ Skip to main content

Fungal diversity notes 1–110: taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions to fungal species

Overview of attention for article published in Fungal Diversity, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
269 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
176 Mendeley
Title
Fungal diversity notes 1–110: taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions to fungal species
Published in
Fungal Diversity, May 2015
DOI 10.1007/s13225-015-0324-y
Authors

Jian Kui Liu, Kevin D. Hyde, E. B. Gareth Jones, Hiran A. Ariyawansa, Darbhe J. Bhat, Saranyaphat Boonmee, Sajeewa S. N. Maharachchikumbura, Eric H. C. McKenzie, Rungtiwa Phookamsak, Chayanard Phukhamsakda, Belle Damodara Shenoy, Mohamed A. Abdel-Wahab, Bart Buyck, Jie Chen, K. W. Thilini Chethana, Chonticha Singtripop, Dong Qin Dai, Yu Cheng Dai, Dinushani A. Daranagama, Asha J. Dissanayake, Mingkwan Doilom, Melvina J. D’souza, Xin Lei Fan, Ishani D. Goonasekara, Kazuyuki Hirayama, Sinang Hongsanan, Subashini C. Jayasiri, Ruvishika S. Jayawardena, Samantha C. Karunarathna, Wen Jing Li, Ausana Mapook, Chada Norphanphoun, Ka Lai Pang, Rekhani H. Perera, Derek Peršoh, Umpava Pinruan, Indunil C. Senanayake, Sayanh Somrithipol, Satinee Suetrong, Kazuaki Tanaka, Kasun M. Thambugala, Qing Tian, Saowaluck Tibpromma, Danushka Udayanga, Nalin N. Wijayawardene, Dhanuska Wanasinghe, Komsit Wisitrassameewong, Xiang Yu Zeng, Faten A. Abdel-Aziz, Slavomir Adamčík, Ali H. Bahkali, Nattawut Boonyuen, Timur Bulgakov, Philippe Callac, Putarak Chomnunti, Katrin Greiner, Akira Hashimoto, Valerie Hofstetter, Ji Chuan Kang, David Lewis, Xing Hong Li, Xing Zhong Liu, Zuo Yi Liu, Misato Matsumura, Peter E. Mortimer, Gerhard Rambold, Emile Randrianjohany, Genki Sato, Veera Sri-Indrasutdhi, Cheng Ming Tian, Annemieke Verbeken, Wolfgang von Brackel, Yong Wang, Ting Chi Wen, Jian Chu Xu, Ji Ye Yan, Rui Lin Zhao, Erio Camporesi

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 176 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Philippines 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 172 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 19%
Researcher 25 14%
Student > Bachelor 19 11%
Student > Master 17 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 5%
Other 20 11%
Unknown 52 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 84 48%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 9%
Environmental Science 6 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 2%
Chemistry 2 1%
Other 5 3%
Unknown 61 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2022.
All research outputs
#7,421,619
of 23,347,114 outputs
Outputs from Fungal Diversity
#103
of 278 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,706
of 265,594 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Fungal Diversity
#6
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,347,114 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 278 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,594 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.