↓ Skip to main content

Effects of Early IL-17A Neutralization on Disease Induction in a Primate Model of Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuroimmune Pharmacology, August 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
Effects of Early IL-17A Neutralization on Disease Induction in a Primate Model of Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis
Published in
Journal of Neuroimmune Pharmacology, August 2010
DOI 10.1007/s11481-010-9238-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yolanda S. Kap, S. Anwar Jagessar, Nikki van Driel, Erwin Blezer, Jan Bauer, Marjan van Meurs, Paul Smith, Jon D. Laman, Bert A. ‘t Hart

Abstract

We report on the effect of antibody-mediated neutralization of interleukin (IL)-17A in a non-human primate experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) model induced with recombinant human myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (rhMOG). We tested a human-anti-human IL-17A-antibody in two doses (3 and 30 mg/kg) against placebo (PBS). The treatment was started 1 day before EAE induction and continued throughout the experiment. Although all monkeys developed clinically evident EAE, the onset of neurological signs was delayed in some monkeys from both treatment groups. Total CNS lesion volumes, demyelination, or inflammation did not differ between the different groups. Immune profiling revealed an altered distribution of IL-17A producing cells in the lymphoid organs of antibody-treated monkeys. Comparable numbers of IL-17A producing cells were observed in the brain. RhMOG-induced T cell proliferation in the lymph nodes was slightly reduced after anti-IL-17A antibody treatment. To summarize, we found that anti-IL-17A antibody as a single treatment from disease induction effects a trend towards delayed neurological disease progression in the marmoset EAE model, although the effect did not reach statistical significance. This suggests a role of IL-17A in late stage disease in the marmoset EAE model, but IL-17A may not be the dominant pathogenic cytokine.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 5%
Denmark 1 5%
Unknown 17 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 37%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 16%
Student > Master 3 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 21%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Computer Science 1 5%
Other 3 16%
Unknown 6 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2011.
All research outputs
#19,702,729
of 24,217,893 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuroimmune Pharmacology
#453
of 583 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,106
of 97,911 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuroimmune Pharmacology
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,217,893 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 583 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 97,911 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.