You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Sensing the Difference: The Influence of Anisotropic Cues on Cell Behavior
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Materials, May 2015
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmats.2015.00039 |
| Authors |
José Ballester-Beltrán, Manus J. P. Biggs, Matthew J. Dalby, Manuel Salmerón-Sánchez, Aldo Leal-Egaña |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | 33% |
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 110 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 26% |
| Researcher | 15 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 12 | 11% |
| Unknown | 25 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 16 | 14% |
| Engineering | 16 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 11% |
| Materials Science | 12 | 11% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 12% |
| Unknown | 37 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2015.
All research outputs
#13,740,344
of 22,803,211 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Materials
#194
of 2,444 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,557
of 264,541 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Materials
#5
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,803,211 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,444 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,541 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.