↓ Skip to main content

Pursuing Pleasures of Productivity: University Students’ Use of Prescription Stimulants for Enhancement and the Moral Uncertainty of Making Work Fun

Overview of attention for article published in Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
Title
Pursuing Pleasures of Productivity: University Students’ Use of Prescription Stimulants for Enhancement and the Moral Uncertainty of Making Work Fun
Published in
Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry, May 2015
DOI 10.1007/s11013-015-9457-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Margit Anne Petersen, Lotte Stig Nørgaard, Janine M. Traulsen

Abstract

This article presents ethnographic data on the use of prescription stimulants for enhancement purposes by university students in New York City. The study shows that students find stimulants a helpful tool in preventing procrastination, particularly in relation to feeling disinterested, overloaded, or insecure. Using stimulants, students seek pleasure in the study situation, for example, to get rid of unpleasant states of mind or intensify an already existing excitement. The article illustrates the notion that enhancement strategies do not only concern productivity in the quantitative sense of bettering results, performances, and opportunities. Students also measure their own success in terms of the qualitative experience of working hard. The article further argues that taking an ethnographic approach facilitates the study of norms in the making, as students experience moral uncertainty-not because they improve study skills and results-but because they enhance the study experience, making work fun. The article thereby seeks to nuance simplistic neoliberal ideas of personhood.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 91 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 20 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 13%
Student > Master 9 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Researcher 6 7%
Other 12 13%
Unknown 26 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 20 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 13%
Psychology 11 12%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 5%
Other 13 14%
Unknown 26 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2020.
All research outputs
#1,596,418
of 23,906,448 outputs
Outputs from Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry
#55
of 622 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,763
of 266,909 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry
#3
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,906,448 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 622 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,909 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.