↓ Skip to main content

Retinal nerve fiber layer and ganglion cell complex thicknesses measured with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography in eyes with no light perception due to nonglaucomatous optic neuropathy

Overview of attention for article published in Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
Retinal nerve fiber layer and ganglion cell complex thicknesses measured with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography in eyes with no light perception due to nonglaucomatous optic neuropathy
Published in
Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology, May 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10384-015-0386-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Atsuya Miki, Takao Endo, Takeshi Morimoto, Kenji Matsushita, Takashi Fujikado, Kohji Nishida

Abstract

To measure retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (RNFLT) and ganglion cell complex thickness (GCCT) in eyes with no light perception due to nonglaucomatous optic neuropathy using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Fourteen eyes of 14 patients (9 women, 5 men; mean age 56.0 ± 16.6 (standard deviation) years] with no light perception due to optic neuropathy were recruited to this retrospective study. Only clinically stable eyes were included. Eyes were imaged at least 6 months after the onset of the disease. Five patients lost light perception due to traumatic optic neuropathy, four patients had ischemic optic neuropathy, two patients had optic neuritis, two patients had compressive optic neuropathy, and one patient had optic nerve atrophy. Global and quadrant RNFLTs were measured with the Cirrus HD-optical coherence tomography (OCT) system; global and hemisphere GCCTs were measured by spectral-domain OCT (RTVue OCT system). Only reliable OCT images were used for further analysis. Reliable RNFL images were obtained in 12 eyes, and reliable GCC images were obtained in 11 eyes. Global, superior, temporal, inferior, and nasal RNFLT were 57.5 ± 6.7, 60.6 ± 7.6, 54.1 ± 11.2, 59.7 ± 9.5, and 55.6 ± 7.4 µm, respectively. Global, superior, and inferior GCC thicknesses were 68.8 ± 9.6, 70.7 ± 12.2, and 67.8 ± 8.8 µm, respectively. A considerable proportion of RNFL and GCC remained in eyes with no light perception vision. Clinicians should take this into account when evaluating the severity of optic neuropathy from OCT-measured RNFLT and GCCT.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 6%
Spain 1 6%
Unknown 16 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 11%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 6 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 56%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Psychology 1 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 6%
Unknown 5 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2015.
All research outputs
#15,331,767
of 22,803,211 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology
#241
of 486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,510
of 264,552 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology
#3
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,803,211 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 486 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,552 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.