| Title |
Traits influencing range contraction in New Zealand’s endemic forest birds
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Oecologia, May 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00442-015-3330-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elizabeth H. Parlato, Doug P. Armstrong, John G. Innes |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| New Zealand | 2 | 22% |
| United States | 1 | 11% |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | 11% |
| Brazil | 1 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 11% |
| Canada | 1 | 11% |
| Japan | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 1 | 11% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 78% |
| Scientists | 2 | 22% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 55 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 22% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 20% |
| Researcher | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 11 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 23 | 42% |
| Environmental Science | 11 | 20% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 5% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Psychology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 12 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2015.
All research outputs
#7,361,161
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#1,526
of 4,603 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,419
of 281,064 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#19
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,603 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,064 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.