↓ Skip to main content

Mesenteric lymph nodes in MR enterography: are they reliable followers of bowel in active Crohn’s disease?

Overview of attention for article published in European Radiology, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
Mesenteric lymph nodes in MR enterography: are they reliable followers of bowel in active Crohn’s disease?
Published in
European Radiology, April 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00330-018-5441-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amir Reza Radmard, Rana Eftekhar Vaghefi, Seyed Ali Montazeri, Sara Naybandi Atashi, Amir Pejman Hashemi Taheri, Sepehr Haghighi, Aneseh Salehnia, Mehrdad Dadgostar, Reza Malekzadeh

Abstract

To demonstrate magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) features of mesenteric lymph nodes (LN) in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) and investigate whether they follow enhancement or apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) parameters of bowel. This study was approved by the institutional review board. A total of 788 MREs from patients with CD were retrospectively reviewed. Eighty-eight patients, aged 16-66 years, including 59 active cases, were enrolled based on inclusion criteria. In each MRE, two segments (normal and abnormal) and two LNs (regional and non-regional) were independently suggested, consensually chosen, and analyzed by two radiologists. Signal-to-noise (SNR) and contrast-to-noise (CNR) ratios were calculated to assess signal intensities (SI) at 30, 60 and 180 s after contrast administration, as well as slope of enhancement (SOE). Enhancement parameters and ADC values were compared. Regional LNs showed significantly higher SI30, SI60 and SI180 (CNR&SNR) and lower ADC values in active vs. inactive groups (all p<0.05) without significant difference in number or size. Strong correlations were demonstrated between abnormal segments and regional LNs in active group in terms of SI30, SI60, SI180, SOE0-30 and ADC values (r = 0.679 to 0.774, all p<0.001). SI180, SOE60-180 and ADC values were moderately correlated between abnormal segments and regional LNs in inactive group (r = 0.448 to 0.595, all p<0.05). In logistic regression analyses, SOE0-30 and ADC value of regional LNs independently predicted active CD. Mesenteric LNs follow quantitative enhancement and diffusion parameters of bowel in active CD. SOE0-30 and ADC value of LN could predict disease activity. • Mesenteric LNs may strongly follow enhancement pattern of bowel in active CD. • DWI parameters of LNs and bowel were strongly correlated in active CD. • SI 180 was moderately correlated between bowel and LNs in inactive CD. • DWI parameters were moderately correlated between LNs and bowel in inactive CD. • SOE 0-30 and ADC value of mesenteric LN could predict disease activity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Librarian 1 6%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Other 3 19%
Unknown 4 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 44%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 6%
Arts and Humanities 1 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 6%
Computer Science 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2021.
All research outputs
#6,314,052
of 23,045,021 outputs
Outputs from European Radiology
#891
of 4,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,354
of 326,539 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Radiology
#22
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,045,021 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,177 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,539 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.