| Title |
Systematic review and meta-analysis comparing land and aquatic exercise for people with hip or knee arthritis on function, mobility and other health outcomes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, June 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2474-12-123 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stephanie I Batterham, Sophie Heywood, Jennifer L Keating |
| Abstract |
Aquatic and land based exercise are frequently prescribed to maintain function for people with arthritis. The relative efficacy of these rehabilitation strategies for this population has not been established.This review investigated the effects of aquatic compared to land based exercise on function, mobility or participants' perception of programs for people with arthritis. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 6 | 32% |
| United States | 3 | 16% |
| Spain | 2 | 11% |
| Australia | 1 | 5% |
| India | 1 | 5% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Lithuania | 1 | 5% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 1 | 5% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 79% |
| Scientists | 2 | 11% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 380 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 3 | <1% |
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Croatia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 367 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 108 | 28% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 58 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 45 | 12% |
| Researcher | 21 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 4% |
| Other | 56 | 15% |
| Unknown | 75 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 122 | 32% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 78 | 21% |
| Sports and Recreations | 43 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 3% |
| Engineering | 8 | 2% |
| Other | 35 | 9% |
| Unknown | 82 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2018.
All research outputs
#1,219,975
of 23,655,983 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#210
of 4,161 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,867
of 113,009 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#2
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,655,983 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,161 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 113,009 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.