You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Development of the Nurse Practitioner Standards for Practice Australia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Policy, Politics, & Nursing Practice, May 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1177/1527154415584233 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrew Cashin, Thomas Buckley, Judith Donoghue, Marie Heartfield, Julianne Bryce, Darlene Cox, Donna Waters, Helen Gosby, John Kelly, Sandra V. Dunn |
| Abstract |
This article describes the context and development of the new Nurse Practitioner Standards for Practice in Australia, which went into effect in January 2014. The researchers used a mixed-methods design to engage a broad range of stakeholders who brought both political and practice knowledge to the development of the new standards. Methods included interviews, focus groups, surveys, and work-based observation of nurse practitioner practice. Stakeholders varied in terms of their need for detail in the standards. Nonetheless, they invariably agreed that the standards should be clinically focussed attributes. The pillars common in many advanced practice nursing standards, such as practice, research, education, and leadership, were combined and expressed in a new and unique clinical attribute. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 133 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Lecturer | 20 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 10% |
| Researcher | 9 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 19 | 14% |
| Unknown | 49 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 60 | 45% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 7% |
| Arts and Humanities | 4 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 1% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 8 | 6% |
| Unknown | 50 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2015.
All research outputs
#15,091,901
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Policy, Politics, & Nursing Practice
#139
of 234 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#136,804
of 278,952 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Policy, Politics, & Nursing Practice
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 234 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,952 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.