| Title |
MeMoVolc consensual document: a review of cross-disciplinary approaches to characterizing small explosive magmatic eruptions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Bulletin of Volcanology, May 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00445-015-0935-x |
| Authors |
L. Gurioli, D. Andronico, P. Bachelery, H. Balcone-Boissard, J. Battaglia, G. Boudon, A. Burgisser, M. R. Burton, K. Cashman, S. Cichy, R. Cioni, A. Di Muro, L. Dominguez, C. D’Oriano, T. Druitt, A. J. L. Harris, M. Hort, K. Kelfoun, J. C. Komorowski, U. Kueppers, J. L. Le Pennec, T. Menand, R. Paris, L. Pioli, M. Pistolesi, M. Polacci, M. Pompilio, M. Ripepe, O. Roche, E. Rose-Koga, A. Rust, F. Schiavi, L. Scharff, R. Sulpizio, J. Taddeucci, T. Thordarson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 79 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 22 | 27% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 9% |
| Professor | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 12% |
| Unknown | 17 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 52 | 64% |
| Chemical Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 1% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 21 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2020.
All research outputs
#13,942,329
of 22,803,211 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of Volcanology
#759
of 1,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,696
of 265,295 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of Volcanology
#14
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,803,211 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,087 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,295 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.