↓ Skip to main content

The Forgotten Role of Glucose Effectiveness in the Regulation of Glucose Tolerance

Overview of attention for article published in Current Diabetes Reports, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
Title
The Forgotten Role of Glucose Effectiveness in the Regulation of Glucose Tolerance
Published in
Current Diabetes Reports, April 2015
DOI 10.1007/s11892-015-0605-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Simmi Dube, Isabel Errazuriz-Cruzat, Ananda Basu, Rita Basu

Abstract

Glucose effectiveness (S G) is the ability of glucose per se to stimulate its own uptake and to suppress its own production under basal/constant insulin concentrations. In an individual, glucose tolerance is a function of insulin secretion, insulin action and S G. Under conditions of declining insulin secretion and action (e.g. type 2 diabetes), the degree of S G assumes increasing significance in determining the level of glucose tolerance both in fasted and postprandial states. Although the importance of S G has been recognized for years, mechanisms that contribute to S G are poorly understood. Research data on modulation of S G and its impact in glucose intolerance is limited. In this review, we will focus on the role of S G in the regulation of glucose tolerance, its evaluation, and potential advantages of therapies that can enhance glucose-induced stimulation of glucose uptake and suppression of its own production in conditions of impaired insulin secretion and action.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 50 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 24%
Researcher 8 16%
Student > Master 7 14%
Student > Bachelor 6 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 12 24%
Unknown 2 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 8%
Engineering 3 6%
Other 9 18%
Unknown 8 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2015.
All research outputs
#13,942,329
of 22,803,211 outputs
Outputs from Current Diabetes Reports
#570
of 1,006 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,501
of 264,354 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Diabetes Reports
#8
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,803,211 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,006 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,354 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.