↓ Skip to main content

CMAJ

Birth outcomes in the Inuit-inhabited areas of Canada

Overview of attention for article published in Canadian Medical Association Journal, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
116 Mendeley
Title
Birth outcomes in the Inuit-inhabited areas of Canada
Published in
Canadian Medical Association Journal, January 2010
DOI 10.1503/cmaj.082042
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zhong-Cheng Luo, Sacha Senécal, Fabienne Simonet, Eric Guimond, Christopher Penney, Russell Wilkins

Abstract

Information on health disparities between Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal populations is essential for developing public health programs aimed at reducing such disparities. The lack of data on disparities in birth outcomes between Inuit and non-Inuit populations in Canada prompted us to compare birth outcomes in Inuit-inhabited areas with those in the rest of the country and in other rural and northern areas of Canada.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 4 3%
Unknown 112 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 20%
Student > Bachelor 21 18%
Researcher 15 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Other 17 15%
Unknown 22 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 15%
Social Sciences 14 12%
Psychology 9 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Other 16 14%
Unknown 21 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2017.
All research outputs
#14,719,073
of 22,653,392 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#6,457
of 8,661 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,155
of 164,237 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#47
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,653,392 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,661 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.6. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,237 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.