↓ Skip to main content

Maintenance of membrane fluidity in Antarctic bacteria

Overview of attention for article published in Polar Biology, May 2001
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
Title
Maintenance of membrane fluidity in Antarctic bacteria
Published in
Polar Biology, May 2001
DOI 10.1007/s003000100232
Authors

M. Chattopadhyay, M. Jagannadham

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 4%
Unknown 52 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 28%
Student > Master 7 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 11%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Professor 3 6%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 10 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 19%
Environmental Science 3 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Chemical Engineering 2 4%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 13 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2019.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Polar Biology
#634
of 1,769 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,305
of 42,351 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Polar Biology
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,769 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 42,351 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.