↓ Skip to main content

Acceptability, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness of internet-based exposure treatment for irritable bowel syndrome in a clinical sample: a randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Gastroenterology, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
110 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
250 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Acceptability, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness of internet-based exposure treatment for irritable bowel syndrome in a clinical sample: a randomized controlled trial
Published in
BMC Gastroenterology, October 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-230x-11-110
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brjánn Ljótsson, Gerhard Andersson, Erik Andersson, Erik Hedman, Perjohan Lindfors, Sergej Andréewitch, Christian Rück, Nils Lindefors

Abstract

Internet-based cognitive behavior therapy (ICBT) has shown promising effects in the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). However, to date no study has used a design where participants have been sampled solely from a clinical population. We aimed to investigate the acceptability, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness of ICBT for IBS using a consecutively recruited sample from a gastroenterological clinic.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 250 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 1%
United States 2 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 241 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 16%
Researcher 33 13%
Student > Master 32 13%
Student > Bachelor 32 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 24 10%
Other 56 22%
Unknown 33 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 100 40%
Medicine and Dentistry 49 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 4%
Social Sciences 8 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 3%
Other 26 10%
Unknown 49 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2012.
All research outputs
#13,355,173
of 22,653,392 outputs
Outputs from BMC Gastroenterology
#621
of 1,720 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,852
of 135,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Gastroenterology
#7
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,653,392 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,720 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 135,950 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.