↓ Skip to main content

Employing aromatic tuning to modulate output from two-component signaling circuits

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Biological Engineering, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Title
Employing aromatic tuning to modulate output from two-component signaling circuits
Published in
Journal of Biological Engineering, May 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13036-015-0003-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rahmi Yusuf, Roger R Draheim

Abstract

Two-component signaling circuits (TCSs) govern the majority of environmental, pathogenic and industrial processes undertaken by bacteria. Therefore, controlling signal output from these circuits in a stimulus-independent manner is of central importance to synthetic microbiologists. Aromatic tuning, or repositioning the aromatic residues commonly found at the cytoplasmic end of the final TM helix has been shown to modulate signal output from the aspartate chemoreceptor (Tar) and the major osmosensor (EnvZ) of Escherichia coli. Aromatic residues are found in a similar location within other bacterial membrane-spanning receptors, suggesting that aromatic tuning could be harnessed for a wide-range of applications. Here, a brief synopsis of the data underpinning aromatic tuning, the initial successes with the method and the inherent advantages over those previously employed for modulating TCS signal output are presented.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 5%
Denmark 1 5%
Argentina 1 5%
Unknown 19 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 18%
Unspecified 2 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 9%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 9%
Student > Master 2 9%
Other 6 27%
Unknown 4 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 18%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 9%
Unspecified 2 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 4 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2018.
All research outputs
#4,689,747
of 22,758,963 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biological Engineering
#73
of 259 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,045
of 265,207 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biological Engineering
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,758,963 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 259 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,207 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.