↓ Skip to main content

A novel approach for in vitro meat production

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
4 X users
patent
10 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
253 Mendeley
Title
A novel approach for in vitro meat production
Published in
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, May 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00253-015-6671-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Muthuraman Pandurangan, Doo Hwan Kim

Abstract

The present review describes the possibility of in vitro meat production with the help of advanced co-culturing methods. In vitro meat production method could be a possible alternative for the conventional meat production. Originally, the research on in vitro meat production was initiated by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) for space voyages. The required key qualities for accepting in vitro meat for consumption would be good efficiency ratio, increased protein synthesis rate in skeletal muscles, and mimicking the conventional meat qualities. In vitro culturing of meat is possible with the use of skeletal muscle tissue engineering, stem cell, cell co-culture, and tissue culture methods. Co-culture of myoblast and fibroblast is believed as one of the major techniques for in vitro meat production. In our lab, we have co-cultured myoblast and fibroblast. We believe that a billion pounds of in vitro meat could be produced from one animal for consumption. However, we require a great deal of research on in vitro meat production.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 253 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 250 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 59 23%
Student > Master 43 17%
Researcher 25 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 4%
Other 34 13%
Unknown 59 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 46 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 40 16%
Engineering 22 9%
Chemical Engineering 12 5%
Environmental Science 9 4%
Other 50 20%
Unknown 74 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2024.
All research outputs
#2,103,294
of 25,503,365 outputs
Outputs from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#149
of 8,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,138
of 279,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#3
of 134 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,503,365 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,318 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,148 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 134 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.