You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effect of Opioids on Tissue Metabolism in Aestivating and Active Green-Striped Burrowing Frogs, Cyclorana alboguttata
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Herpetology, June 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1670/12-039 |
| Authors |
Sara M. Kayes, Rebecca L. Cramp, Nicholas J. Hudson, Craig E. Franklin |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 11 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 27% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 18% |
| Researcher | 1 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 4 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 36% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 9% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 4 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2015.
All research outputs
#7,355,930
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Herpetology
#221
of 1,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,075
of 206,481 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Herpetology
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,083 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,481 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.