You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
顧みられない熱帯病(Neglected Tropical Diseases)制圧—第66回世界保健総会決議とWHOの取り組み
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Kokusai Hoken Iryo (Journal of International Health), December 2013
|
| DOI | 10.11197/jaih.28.337 |
| Authors |
一盛 和世, 矢島 綾, 森岡 翠, 福田 智美, 鴨川 由美子 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2015.
All research outputs
#15,175,718
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Kokusai Hoken Iryo (Journal of International Health)
#13
of 38 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#179,769
of 321,028 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Kokusai Hoken Iryo (Journal of International Health)
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 38 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one scored the same or higher as 25 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,028 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them