↓ Skip to main content

Weight lifting and appendicular skeletal muscle mass among breast cancer survivors: a randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
9 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
191 Mendeley
Title
Weight lifting and appendicular skeletal muscle mass among breast cancer survivors: a randomized controlled trial
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, May 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10549-015-3409-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Justin C. Brown, Kathryn H. Schmitz

Abstract

Low appendicular skeletal muscle mass (ASMM) is associated with premature mortality, hyperinsulinemia, frailty, disability, and low bone mineral density. We explored the potential efficacy of slowly progressive weight lifting to attenuate the decline of ASMM among breast cancer survivors by conducting a post hoc analysis of data from the Physical Activity and Lymphedema trial. Between October 2005 and August 2008, we conducted a single-blind, randomized controlled trial of twice weekly slowly progressive weight lifting or standard care among 295 non-metastatic breast cancer survivors. ASMM was quantified using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Changes in ASMM were evaluated from baseline to 12 months between the weight lifting and control groups using repeated measures linear mixed effects regression models. Over 12 months, participants in the weight lifting group experienced attenuated declines in muscle mass compared to the control group, as reflected by relative ASMM (-0.01 ± 0.02 kg/m(2) vs -0.08 ± 0.03 kg/m(2); P = 0.041) and absolute ASMM (-0.02 ± 0.06 kg vs -0.22 ± 0.07 kg; P = 0.038), respectively. Weight lifting did not alter other body composition outcomes including body mass index, total body mass, body fat percentage, and fat mass compared to the control group. Weight lifting significantly increased upper and lower body muscle strength compared to the control group. The intervention was well tolerated with no serious adverse events related to weight lifting. Slowly progressive weight lifting attenuated the decline of ASMM among breast cancer survivors compared to standard care over 12 months. These data are hypothesis generating. Future studies should examine the efficacy of weight lifting to improve distal health outcomes among breast cancer survivors.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 191 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 190 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 10%
Student > Postgraduate 18 9%
Student > Bachelor 18 9%
Researcher 17 9%
Other 42 22%
Unknown 54 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 22%
Sports and Recreations 27 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 8%
Unspecified 15 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 4%
Other 17 9%
Unknown 66 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2015.
All research outputs
#1,721,657
of 22,803,211 outputs
Outputs from Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
#227
of 4,656 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,510
of 264,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
#6
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,803,211 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,656 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,280 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.