↓ Skip to main content

Night-time non-nutritive sucking in infants aged 1 to 5 months: relationship with infant state, breastfeeding, and bed-sharing versus room-sharing

Overview of attention for article published in Early Human Development, December 1999
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Night-time non-nutritive sucking in infants aged 1 to 5 months: relationship with infant state, breastfeeding, and bed-sharing versus room-sharing
Published in
Early Human Development, December 1999
DOI 10.1016/s0378-3782(99)00045-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katie Pollard, Peter Fleming, Jeanine Young, Andrew Sawczenko, Peter Blair

Abstract

Epidemiological studies suggest that pacifier use may be protective against SIDS but little is known of the relationship between pacifier use and other forms of non-nutritive sucking (NNS) in infancy, or of patterns of NNS during the night, when most SIDS deaths occur. We report the first longitudinal study of NNS by direct overnight observations in healthy infants in a sleep laboratory. Healthy, breast fed term infants (n = 10) were enrolled at birth, and sequential overnight polygraphic and infrared video recordings of infants with their mothers performed at monthly intervals from 1 to 5 months. Each month, mother baby pairs were randomized to 1 night bed-sharing (BN) then 1 room-sharing (RN), or vice versa. 'Episodes' of pacifier, own digit and mother's digit sucking (> 1 min) were identified and compared with state-matched control periods without sucking or feeding before and after each such episode. 329 episodes of NNS were identified in 749 h of video recording. The prevalence of pacifier sucking decreased with age, whilst digit sucking increased. Routine pacifier users rarely sucked their digits. There were temporal differences throughout the night in the distribution of different types of sucking and in infant state during and around sucking episodes. Sleeping in the 'non-routine' location was associated with a larger percentage of nights with sucking episodes and increased sleep latency. Bed sharing (routinely or on a given night) was associated with less sucking behavior and more breastfeeding. Non-nutritive sucking was not, however, associated with decreased total time breastfeeding per night or number of feeds per night. Patterns of NNS during the night change with age and are affected by maternal proximity. Digit sucking has state modulating effects, and may be suppressed by pacifier use. Thus any benefits of pacifier use must be set against the potential loss of a self-directed ability to modulate state during the night, and possible shortening of breastfeeding duration.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 54 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 21%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Researcher 4 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 7%
Other 10 17%
Unknown 18 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 12 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 19%
Social Sciences 6 10%
Psychology 3 5%
Engineering 3 5%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 17 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2021.
All research outputs
#7,778,510
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Early Human Development
#546
of 1,771 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,323
of 107,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Early Human Development
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,771 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,744 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.