↓ Skip to main content

Rare copy number variants are an important cause of epileptic encephalopathies

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Neurology, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
217 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
163 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Rare copy number variants are an important cause of epileptic encephalopathies
Published in
Annals of Neurology, December 2011
DOI 10.1002/ana.22645
Pubmed ID
Authors

Heather C. Mefford, Simone C. Yendle, Cynthia Hsu, Joseph Cook, Eileen Geraghty, Jacinta M. McMahon, Orvar Eeg‐Olofsson, Lynette G. Sadleir, Deepak Gill, Bruria Ben‐Zeev, Tally Lerman‐Sagie, Mark Mackay, Jeremy L. Freeman, Eva Andermann, James T. Pelakanos, Ian Andrews, Geoffrey Wallace, Evan E. Eichler, Samuel F. Berkovic, Ingrid E. Scheffer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 163 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 157 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 18%
Researcher 27 17%
Other 15 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 13 8%
Student > Bachelor 12 7%
Other 34 21%
Unknown 32 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 13%
Neuroscience 12 7%
Computer Science 3 2%
Other 11 7%
Unknown 42 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2012.
All research outputs
#7,229,924
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Neurology
#2,955
of 5,755 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,523
of 255,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Neurology
#16
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,755 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,062 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.