↓ Skip to main content

Clinically relevant anatomy and what anatomic reconstruction means

Overview of attention for article published in Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
125 Mendeley
Title
Clinically relevant anatomy and what anatomic reconstruction means
Published in
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, May 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00167-015-3629-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert F. LaPrade, Samuel G. Moulton, Marco Nitri, Werner Mueller, Lars Engebretsen

Abstract

Within the past 20 years, knee ligament injuries have been increasingly reported in the literature to be treated with anatomic reconstructions over soft tissue advancements or sling-type procedures to recreate the native anatomy and restore knee function. Historically, early clinician scientists published on the qualitative anatomy of the knee, which provided a foundation for the initial knee biomechanical studies in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. Similarly, the work of early sports medicine orthopaedic clinician scientists in the late twentieth century formed the basis for the quantitative anatomic and functional robotic biomechanical studies found currently in the sports medicine orthopaedic literature. The development of an anatomic reconstruction first requires an appreciation of the quantitative anatomy and function of each major stabilizing component of the knee. This paper provides an overview of the initial qualitative anatomic studies from which the initial knee ligament surgeries were based and expands to recent detailed quantitative studies of the major knee ligaments and the renewed recent focus on anatomic surgical reconstructions. Anatomic repairs and reconstructions of the anterior cruciate ligament, posterior cruciate ligament, medial collateral ligament and posterolateral corner attempt to restore knee function by rebuilding or restoring the native anatomy. The basis of anatomic reconstruction techniques is a detailed understanding of quantitative knee anatomy. Additionally, an appreciation of the function of each component is necessary to ensure surgical success. V.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 125 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 13%
Student > Postgraduate 13 10%
Student > Master 11 9%
Student > Bachelor 10 8%
Other 9 7%
Other 26 21%
Unknown 40 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 67 54%
Sports and Recreations 3 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Engineering 2 2%
Chemistry 2 2%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 42 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2017.
All research outputs
#2,461,534
of 22,803,211 outputs
Outputs from Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
#269
of 2,647 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,484
of 263,961 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
#3
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,803,211 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,647 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,961 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.