↓ Skip to main content

Contrasting species and functional beta diversity in montane ant assemblages

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Biogeography, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
107 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
452 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Contrasting species and functional beta diversity in montane ant assemblages
Published in
Journal of Biogeography, May 2015
DOI 10.1111/jbi.12537
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tom R. Bishop, Mark P. Robertson, Berndt J. van Rensburg, Catherine L. Parr

Abstract

Beta diversity describes the variation in species composition between sites and can be used to infer why different species occupy different parts of the globe. It can be viewed in a number of ways. First, it can be partitioned into two distinct patterns: turnover and nestedness. Second, it can be investigated from either a species identity or a functional-trait point of view. We aim to document for the first time how these two aspects of beta diversity vary in response to a large environmental gradient. Maloti-Drakensberg Mountains, southern Africa. We sampled ant assemblages along an extensive elevational gradient (900-3000 m a.s.l.) twice yearly for 7 years, and collected functional-trait information related to the species' dietary and habitat-structure preferences. We used recently developed methods to partition species and functional beta diversity into their turnover and nestedness components. A series of null models were used to test whether the observed beta diversity patterns differed from random expectations. Species beta diversity was driven by turnover, but functional beta diversity was composed of both turnover and nestedness patterns at different parts of the gradient. Null models revealed that deterministic processes were likely to be responsible for the species patterns but that the functional changes were indistinguishable from stochasticity. Different ant species are found with increasing elevation, but they tend to represent an increasingly nested subset of the available functional strategies. This finding is unique and narrows down the list of possible factors that control ant existence across elevation. We conclude that diet and habitat preferences have little role in structuring ant assemblages in montane environments and that some other factor must be driving the non-random patterns of species turnover. This finding also highlights the importance of distinguishing between different kinds of beta diversity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 452 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 7 2%
France 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Estonia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 434 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 93 21%
Student > Master 83 18%
Researcher 58 13%
Student > Bachelor 46 10%
Student > Postgraduate 37 8%
Other 68 15%
Unknown 67 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 230 51%
Environmental Science 104 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 10 2%
Engineering 3 <1%
Other 9 2%
Unknown 86 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2015.
All research outputs
#4,580,956
of 24,542,484 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biogeography
#1,098
of 3,221 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,364
of 270,004 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biogeography
#11
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,542,484 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,221 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,004 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.