↓ Skip to main content

Borderline personality disorder and childhood trauma: Evidence for a causal relationship

Overview of attention for article published in Current Psychiatry Reports, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
229 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
263 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Borderline personality disorder and childhood trauma: Evidence for a causal relationship
Published in
Current Psychiatry Reports, January 2009
DOI 10.1007/s11920-009-0010-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeffrey S. Ball, Paul S. Links

Abstract

The debate over whether childhood trauma is a causative factor in the development of borderline personality disorder continues in the literature despite decades of research. This review examines this body of literature published from 1995 through 2007 to assess the strength of evidence for such a causal relationship. A unique conceptual approach was used, as we considered the literature in the context of Hill's classic criteria for demonstrating causation. Results of this review suggest that evidence supports the causal relationship, particularly if the relationship is considered as part of a multifactorial etiologic model. Directions for future research and clinical implications are discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 263 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 259 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 48 18%
Student > Master 37 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 28 11%
Researcher 19 7%
Other 34 13%
Unknown 65 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 123 47%
Medicine and Dentistry 26 10%
Social Sciences 12 5%
Neuroscience 8 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 3%
Other 19 7%
Unknown 67 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2022.
All research outputs
#6,621,593
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Current Psychiatry Reports
#580
of 1,305 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,123
of 190,675 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Psychiatry Reports
#5
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,305 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,675 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.