↓ Skip to main content

A human factors approach to observation chart design can trump health professionals’ prior chart experience

Overview of attention for article published in Resuscitation, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A human factors approach to observation chart design can trump health professionals’ prior chart experience
Published in
Resuscitation, October 2012
DOI 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2012.09.023
Pubmed ID
Authors

Melany J. Christofidis, Andrew Hill, Mark S. Horswill, Marcus O. Watson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Denmark 1 2%
Unknown 47 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 22%
Researcher 7 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Student > Master 4 8%
Other 11 22%
Unknown 8 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 16%
Psychology 5 10%
Engineering 5 10%
Computer Science 4 8%
Other 8 16%
Unknown 8 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2021.
All research outputs
#8,262,981
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Resuscitation
#2,562
of 5,693 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,672
of 191,553 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Resuscitation
#32
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,693 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 191,553 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.