↓ Skip to main content

Recommendations for Accurate Resolution of Gene and Isoform Allele-Specific Expression in RNA-Seq Data

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
8 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
110 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Recommendations for Accurate Resolution of Gene and Isoform Allele-Specific Expression in RNA-Seq Data
Published in
PLOS ONE, May 2015
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0126911
Pubmed ID
Authors

David L. A. Wood, Katia Nones, Anita Steptoe, Angelika Christ, Ivon Harliwong, Felicity Newell, Timothy J. C. Bruxner, David Miller, Nicole Cloonan, Sean M. Grimmond

Abstract

Genetic variation modulates gene expression transcriptionally or post-transcriptionally, and can profoundly alter an individual's phenotype. Measuring allelic differential expression at heterozygous loci within an individual, a phenomenon called allele-specific expression (ASE), can assist in identifying such factors. Massively parallel DNA and RNA sequencing and advances in bioinformatic methodologies provide an outstanding opportunity to measure ASE genome-wide. In this study, matched DNA and RNA sequencing, genotyping arrays and computationally phased haplotypes were integrated to comprehensively and conservatively quantify ASE in a single human brain and liver tissue sample. We describe a methodological evaluation and assessment of common bioinformatic steps for ASE quantification, and recommend a robust approach to accurately measure SNP, gene and isoform ASE through the use of personalized haplotype genome alignment, strict alignment quality control and intragenic SNP aggregation. Our results indicate that accurate ASE quantification requires careful bioinformatic analyses and is adversely affected by sample specific alignment confounders and random sampling even at moderate sequence depths. We identified multiple known and several novel ASE genes in liver, including WDR72, DSP and UBD, as well as genes that contained ASE SNPs with imbalance direction discordant with haplotype phase, explainable by annotated transcript structure, suggesting isoform derived ASE. The methods evaluated in this study will be of use to researchers performing highly conservative quantification of ASE, and the genes and isoforms identified as ASE of interest to researchers studying those loci.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Norway 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 101 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 30 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 23%
Student > Master 13 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 6%
Other 16 15%
Unknown 11 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 56 51%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 27 25%
Computer Science 8 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 4%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 <1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 12 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2021.
All research outputs
#2,204,394
of 22,805,349 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#28,077
of 194,573 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,020
of 264,481 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#844
of 6,863 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,805,349 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,573 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,481 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6,863 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.