↓ Skip to main content

On the Complexity of Computing Winning Strategies for Finite Poset Games

Overview of attention for article published in Theory of Computing Systems, February 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#26 of 132)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
On the Complexity of Computing Winning Strategies for Finite Poset Games
Published in
Theory of Computing Systems, February 2010
DOI 10.1007/s00224-010-9254-y
Authors

Michael Soltys, Craig Wilson

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 40%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 20%
Professor 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 2 40%
Computer Science 1 20%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2022.
All research outputs
#7,459,393
of 22,805,349 outputs
Outputs from Theory of Computing Systems
#26
of 132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,665
of 94,059 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theory of Computing Systems
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,805,349 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 132 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,059 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them