↓ Skip to main content

Combining tumor genome simulation with crowdsourcing to benchmark somatic single-nucleotide-variant detection

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Methods, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
50 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
278 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
421 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Combining tumor genome simulation with crowdsourcing to benchmark somatic single-nucleotide-variant detection
Published in
Nature Methods, May 2015
DOI 10.1038/nmeth.3407
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adam D Ewing, Kathleen E Houlahan, Yin Hu, Kyle Ellrott, Cristian Caloian, Takafumi N Yamaguchi, J Christopher Bare, Christine P'ng, Daryl Waggott, Veronica Y Sabelnykova, Michael R Kellen, Thea C Norman, David Haussler, Stephen H Friend, Gustavo Stolovitzky, Adam A Margolin, Joshua M Stuart, Paul C Boutros

Abstract

The detection of somatic mutations from cancer genome sequences is key to understanding the genetic basis of disease progression, patient survival and response to therapy. Benchmarking is needed for tool assessment and improvement but is complicated by a lack of gold standards, by extensive resource requirements and by difficulties in sharing personal genomic information. To resolve these issues, we launched the ICGC-TCGA DREAM Somatic Mutation Calling Challenge, a crowdsourced benchmark of somatic mutation detection algorithms. Here we report the BAMSurgeon tool for simulating cancer genomes and the results of 248 analyses of three in silico tumors created with it. Different algorithms exhibit characteristic error profiles, and, intriguingly, false positives show a trinucleotide profile very similar to one found in human tumors. Although the three simulated tumors differ in sequence contamination (deviation from normal cell sequence) and in subclonality, an ensemble of pipelines outperforms the best individual pipeline in all cases. BAMSurgeon is available at https://github.com/adamewing/bamsurgeon/.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 50 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 421 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 2%
Spain 3 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Other 8 2%
Unknown 393 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 116 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 76 18%
Student > Master 39 9%
Student > Bachelor 36 9%
Other 35 8%
Other 59 14%
Unknown 60 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 127 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 109 26%
Computer Science 38 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 25 6%
Engineering 12 3%
Other 30 7%
Unknown 80 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 55. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2023.
All research outputs
#781,490
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Nature Methods
#1,021
of 5,404 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,014
of 283,176 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Methods
#15
of 104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,404 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 283,176 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.