↓ Skip to main content

A high-resolution map of human evolutionary constraint using 29 mammals

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
1001 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1620 Mendeley
citeulike
46 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A high-resolution map of human evolutionary constraint using 29 mammals
Published in
Nature, October 2011
DOI 10.1038/nature10530
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kerstin Lindblad-Toh, Manuel Garber, Or Zuk, Michael F. Lin, Brian J. Parker, Stefan Washietl, Pouya Kheradpour, Jason Ernst, Gregory Jordan, Evan Mauceli, Lucas D. Ward, Craig B. Lowe, Alisha K. Holloway, Michele Clamp, Sante Gnerre, Jessica Alföldi, Kathryn Beal, Jean Chang, Hiram Clawson, James Cuff, Federica Di Palma, Stephen Fitzgerald, Paul Flicek, Mitchell Guttman, Melissa J. Hubisz, David B. Jaffe, Irwin Jungreis, W. James Kent, Dennis Kostka, Marcia Lara, Andre L. Martins, Tim Massingham, Ida Moltke, Brian J. Raney, Matthew D. Rasmussen, Jim Robinson, Alexander Stark, Albert J. Vilella, Jiayu Wen, Xiaohui Xie, Michael C. Zody, Kim C. Worley, Christie L. Kovar, Donna M. Muzny, Richard A. Gibbs, Wesley C. Warren, Elaine R. Mardis, George M. Weinstock, Richard K. Wilson, Ewan Birney, Elliott H. Margulies, Javier Herrero, Eric D. Green, David Haussler, Adam Siepel, Nick Goldman, Katherine S. Pollard, Jakob S. Pedersen, Eric S. Lander, Manolis Kellis

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,620 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 60 4%
United Kingdom 20 1%
Germany 15 <1%
Spain 8 <1%
France 7 <1%
Brazil 7 <1%
Sweden 7 <1%
Japan 5 <1%
Portugal 4 <1%
Other 57 4%
Unknown 1430 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 437 27%
Researcher 419 26%
Student > Master 144 9%
Student > Bachelor 109 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 91 6%
Other 286 18%
Unknown 134 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 907 56%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 304 19%
Computer Science 49 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 48 3%
Neuroscience 33 2%
Other 116 7%
Unknown 163 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 80. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2024.
All research outputs
#539,531
of 25,564,614 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#23,626
of 98,239 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,026
of 148,702 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#192
of 938 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,564,614 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,239 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 148,702 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 938 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.