↓ Skip to main content

Interventions for postnatal depression assessing the mother–infant relationship and child developmental outcomes: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Women's Health, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
77 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
201 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions for postnatal depression assessing the mother–infant relationship and child developmental outcomes: a systematic review
Published in
International Journal of Women's Health, April 2015
DOI 10.2147/ijwh.s75311
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zoe-Lydia Tsivos, Rachel Calam, Matthew R Sanders, Anja Wittkowski

Abstract

Postnatal depression (PND) has negative effects on maternal well-being as well as implications for the mother-infant relationship, subsequent infant development, and family functioning. There is growing evidence demonstrating that PND impacts on a mother's ability to interact with sensitivity and responsiveness as a caregiver, which may have implications for the infant's development of self-regulatory skills, making the infant more vulnerable to later psychopathology. Given the possible intergenerational transmission of risk to the infant, the mother-infant relationship is a focus for treatment and research. However, few studies have assessed the effect of treatment on the mother-infant relationship and child developmental outcomes. The main aim of this paper was to conduct a systematic review and investigate effect sizes of interventions for PND, which assess the quality of the mother-infant dyad relationship and/or child outcomes in addition to maternal mood. Nineteen studies were selected for review, and their methodological quality was evaluated, where possible, effect sizes across maternal mood, quality of dyadic relationship, and child developmental outcomes were calculated. Finally, clinical implications in the treatment of PND are highlighted and recommendations made for further research.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 201 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Unknown 199 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 15%
Student > Master 29 14%
Researcher 19 9%
Student > Bachelor 15 7%
Other 12 6%
Other 40 20%
Unknown 56 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 56 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 27 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 10%
Social Sciences 17 8%
Neuroscience 4 2%
Other 14 7%
Unknown 62 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2021.
All research outputs
#1,295,595
of 25,287,709 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Women's Health
#84
of 871 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,211
of 271,435 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Women's Health
#4
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,287,709 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 871 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,435 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.