| Title |
The AlpArray Seismic Network: A Large-Scale European Experiment to Image the Alpine Orogen
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Surveys in Geophysics, April 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10712-018-9472-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
György Hetényi, Irene Molinari, John Clinton, Götz Bokelmann, István Bondár, Wayne C. Crawford, Jean-Xavier Dessa, Cécile Doubre, Wolfgang Friederich, Florian Fuchs, Domenico Giardini, Zoltán Gráczer, Mark R. Handy, Marijan Herak, Yan Jia, Edi Kissling, Heidrun Kopp, Michael Korn, Lucia Margheriti, Thomas Meier, Marco Mucciarelli, Anne Paul, Damiano Pesaresi, Claudia Piromallo, Thomas Plenefisch, Jaroslava Plomerová, Joachim Ritter, Georg Rümpker, Vesna Šipka, Daniele Spallarossa, Christine Thomas, Frederik Tilmann, Joachim Wassermann, Michael Weber, Zoltán Wéber, Viktor Wesztergom, Mladen Živčić, AlpArray Seismic Network Team, AlpArray OBS Cruise Crew, AlpArray Working Group |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 45 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 16% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 9% |
| France | 4 | 9% |
| Switzerland | 3 | 7% |
| Italy | 2 | 4% |
| Japan | 2 | 4% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Belgium | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 17 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 33 | 73% |
| Scientists | 11 | 24% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 81 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 26 | 32% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 12% |
| Unknown | 11 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 54 | 67% |
| Engineering | 3 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 1% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 18 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 77. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2021.
All research outputs
#565,851
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Surveys in Geophysics
#8
of 324 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,654
of 344,682 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surveys in Geophysics
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 324 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,682 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them