| Title |
Coordination of Pharyngeal and Laryngeal Swallowing Events During Single Liquid Swallows After Oral Endotracheal Intubation for Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Dysphagia, April 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00455-018-9901-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Martin B. Brodsky, Ishani De, Kalyan Chilukuri, Minxuan Huang, Jeffrey B. Palmer, Dale M. Needham |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 59 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 13 | 22% |
| United Kingdom | 12 | 20% |
| Australia | 4 | 7% |
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| Chile | 1 | 2% |
| Austria | 1 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| Costa Rica | 1 | 2% |
| Antigua and Barbuda | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 19 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 39 | 66% |
| Scientists | 11 | 19% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 115 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 16 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 12% |
| Professor | 6 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 13% |
| Unknown | 43 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 18% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
| Linguistics | 2 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Unknown | 53 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2020.
All research outputs
#1,135,362
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Dysphagia
#29
of 1,382 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,462
of 341,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Dysphagia
#1
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,382 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,217 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.