| Title |
Embedding a Recovery Orientation into Neuroscience Research: Involving People with a Lived Experience in Research Activity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Psychiatric Quarterly, May 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11126-015-9364-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anthony Stratford, Lisa Brophy, David Castle, Carol Harvey, Joanne Robertson, Philip Corlett, Larry Davidson, Ian Everall |
| Abstract |
This paper highlights the importance and value of involving people with a lived experience of mental ill health and recovery in neuroscience research activity. In this era of recovery oriented service delivery, involving people with the lived experience of mental illness in neuroscience research extends beyond their participation as "subjects". The recovery paradigm reconceptualises people with the lived experience of mental ill health as experts by experience. To support this contribution, local policies and procedures, recovery-oriented training for neuroscience researchers, and dialogue about the practical applications of neuroscience research, are required. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 47 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 12% |
| Librarian | 2 | 4% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 15 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 11 | 22% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 8% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 17 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2018.
All research outputs
#1,628,104
of 24,037,774 outputs
Outputs from Psychiatric Quarterly
#36
of 640 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,101
of 268,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychiatric Quarterly
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,037,774 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 640 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,273 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.