↓ Skip to main content

Unilateral pulmonary venous occlusion caused by a localized pericardial clot

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Unilateral pulmonary venous occlusion caused by a localized pericardial clot
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine, April 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00134-018-5184-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sundar Krishnan, Matthew J. Maxwell, Brett A. Myers

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2018.
All research outputs
#15,506,823
of 23,045,021 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#4,045
of 5,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#207,448
of 325,398 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#101
of 116 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,045,021 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,023 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.4. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,398 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 116 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.