↓ Skip to main content

Mechanism Underlying the Effects of Estrogen Deficiency on Otoconia

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
Title
Mechanism Underlying the Effects of Estrogen Deficiency on Otoconia
Published in
Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, April 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10162-018-0666-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Liping Yang, Yinfang Xu, Yan Zhang, Sarath Vijayakumar, Sherri M. Jones, Yunxia (Yesha) Wang Lundberg

Abstract

Otoconia-related vertigo and balance deficits, particularly benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV), are common. Our recent studies in humans show that, while BPPV prevalence greatly increases with age in both genders, peri-menopausal women are especially susceptible. In the present study, we show that bilateral ovariectomized (OVX) mice have significant balance behavioral deficits, and that estrogen deficiency compromises otoconia maintenance and anchoring by reducing the expression of otoconial component and anchoring proteins. There is ectopic debris formation in the ampulla under estrogen deficiency due to aberrant matrix protein expression. Furthermore, phytoestrogen is effective in rescuing the otoconia abnormalities. By comparing the expression levels of known estrogen receptor (Esr) subtypes, and by examining the otoconia phenotypes of null mice for selected receptors, we postulate that Esr2 may be critical in mediating the effects of estrogen in otoconia maintenance.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 24%
Student > Master 7 17%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Unspecified 3 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 11 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 12%
Neuroscience 5 12%
Unspecified 3 7%
Sports and Recreations 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 15 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2018.
All research outputs
#15,394,268
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology
#257
of 429 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#197,560
of 328,599 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 429 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,599 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.