You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Nutrient enrichment intensifies hurricane impact in scrub mangrove ecosystems in the Indian River Lagoon, Florida, USA
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ecology, November 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1890/14-1853.1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ilka C. Feller, Emily M. Dangremond, Donna J. Devlin, Catherine E. Lovelock, C. Edward Proffitt, Wilfrid Rodriguez |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 33% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 11% |
| Bangladesh | 1 | 11% |
| Jamaica | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 3 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 22% |
| Scientists | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 123 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 17% |
| Researcher | 18 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 19 | 15% |
| Unknown | 31 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 42 | 33% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 25 | 20% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 12 | 10% |
| Unknown | 35 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2015.
All research outputs
#6,853,768
of 25,394,081 outputs
Outputs from Ecology
#2,922
of 6,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,070
of 294,857 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecology
#35
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,081 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,852 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 294,857 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.