Title |
The limiting information capacity of a neuronal link
|
---|---|
Published in |
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, June 1952
|
DOI | 10.1007/bf02477711 |
Authors |
Donald M. MacKay, Warren S. McCulloch |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 2% |
Germany | 2 | 2% |
Switzerland | 2 | 2% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
Chile | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Sweden | 1 | <1% |
India | 1 | <1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
Other | 4 | 3% |
Unknown | 105 | 85% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 24% |
Researcher | 26 | 21% |
Student > Master | 19 | 15% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 11 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 7% |
Other | 22 | 18% |
Unknown | 7 | 6% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 37 | 30% |
Neuroscience | 19 | 15% |
Engineering | 15 | 12% |
Physics and Astronomy | 13 | 11% |
Computer Science | 11 | 9% |
Other | 18 | 15% |
Unknown | 10 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2015.
All research outputs
#6,981,937
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
#241
of 1,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110
of 802 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,312 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 802 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them