↓ Skip to main content

Patient led goal setting in chronic low back pain—What goals are important to the patient and are they aligned to what we measure?

Overview of attention for article published in Patient Education & Counseling, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#33 of 4,167)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
114 X users
facebook
8 Facebook pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
185 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Patient led goal setting in chronic low back pain—What goals are important to the patient and are they aligned to what we measure?
Published in
Patient Education & Counseling, April 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.pec.2015.04.012
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tania Gardner, Kathryn Refshauge, James McAuley, Stephen Goodall, Markus Hübscher, Lorraine Smith

Abstract

To determine the extent of alignment between clinical outcome measures and patient-derived goals for the management of chronic low back pain (cLBP). A customised, patient-led goal setting intervention was implemented facilitated by a physiotherapist, in which participants identified problem areas and developed strategies to address them. Patient goals were compared to the most commonly used outcome measures in cLBP as well as research outcomes recommended by the IMMPACT consortium. From 20 participants, a total of 27 unique goals were identified, the most common goal related to physical activity (49%). Comparison of participant goals to the most common measures used by physiotherapists found none of the goals could be aligned. Comparison of goals and domains with IMPACCT outcome domains found 76% of the goals were aligned with physical functioning and 16% with emotional functioning. This study has identified goals important to patients in cLBP, these were varied, and most did not correspond with current clinical measures. Clinical outcome measures may not be providing accurate information about the success of treatments that are meaningful to the patient. Clinicians should consider a collaborative approach with cLBP patients to determine treatment interventions that are driven by patient preference.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 114 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 185 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 2 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 181 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 35 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 13%
Other 22 12%
Researcher 15 8%
Student > Bachelor 14 8%
Other 27 15%
Unknown 48 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 37 20%
Sports and Recreations 9 5%
Social Sciences 9 5%
Psychology 8 4%
Other 21 11%
Unknown 56 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 86. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2021.
All research outputs
#494,074
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Patient Education & Counseling
#33
of 4,167 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,561
of 279,958 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient Education & Counseling
#1
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,167 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,958 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.