| Title |
Insights into the Responsiveness of Cork Oak (Quercus suber L.) to Bark Harvesting
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Economic Botany, May 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12231-015-9305-z |
| Authors |
Augusta Costa, Luís Catela Nunes, Heinrich Spiecker, José Graça |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 23% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 8 | 62% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 3 | 23% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 9 | 69% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2015.
All research outputs
#19,341,978
of 24,629,540 outputs
Outputs from Economic Botany
#827
of 878 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#185,349
of 271,012 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Economic Botany
#8
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,629,540 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 878 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,012 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.