↓ Skip to main content

Denosumab versus zoledronic acid in patients previously treated with zoledronic acid

Overview of attention for article published in Osteoporosis International, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
Title
Denosumab versus zoledronic acid in patients previously treated with zoledronic acid
Published in
Osteoporosis International, May 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00198-015-3174-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

A. D. Anastasilakis, S. A. Polyzos, A. Gkiomisi, Z. G. Saridakis, D. Digkas, I. Bisbinas, G. T. Sakellariou, A. Papatheodorou, P. Kokkoris, P. Makras

Abstract

Denosumab and zoledronic acid are potent antiresorptives. In this study in patients pre-treated with zoledronic acid, denosumab achieved similar increases with zoledronic acid in lumbar spine BMD despite the more prominent reduction of bone turnover markers. Denosumab reversibly reduced endogenous RANKL. We aimed to compare yearly changes in lumbar spine (LS) bone mineral density (BMD), bone turnover markers, free soluble receptor activator of nuclear factor kappaB ligand (sRANKL) and sclerostin levels between denosumab and zoledronic acid. Postmenopausal women with low bone mass previously treated with zoledronic acid for 1 year were assigned to denosumab injection (n = 32) or zoledronic acid infusion (n = 26). Procollagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide (P1NP), C-terminal cross-linking telopeptide of type 1 collagen (CTx), sRANKL, and sclerostin levels were measured in serum samples obtained at baseline and 3, 6, and 12 months after denosumab injection or zoledronic acid infusion. LS BMD was measured at baseline and 12 months. The mean LS increase was 4.5 and 4.4 % with denosumab and zoledronic acid, respectively (p = 0.560). Denosumab caused a larger decrease in CTx at 3 months (p < 0.001) and P1NP at 3 (p < 0.001), 6 (p = 0.021), and 12 months (p = 0.042). Denosumab significantly decreased sRANKL by 87.4 % at 3 months (p < 0.001). Sclerostin levels were not changed with either intervention (p = 0.162 and p = 0.214, respectively). In patients previously treated with zoledronic acid, denosumab reduces bone turnover more than zoledronic acid, but the increases in LS BMD are comparable. Furthermore, denosumab administration results in reversible inhibition of the metabolically significant endogenous free soluble RANKL levels. Serum sclerostin is not affected by either agent.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 1%
Unknown 77 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 17%
Student > Master 12 15%
Other 7 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 6%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Other 21 27%
Unknown 15 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 47%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 1%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 19 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2021.
All research outputs
#6,827,116
of 22,914,829 outputs
Outputs from Osteoporosis International
#1,174
of 3,620 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,226
of 266,724 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Osteoporosis International
#27
of 103 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,914,829 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,620 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,724 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 103 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.