Title |
Recent developments in biocatalysis in multiphasic ionic liquid reaction systems
|
---|---|
Published in |
Biophysical Reviews, April 2018
|
DOI | 10.1007/s12551-018-0423-6 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Lars-Erik Meyer, Jan von Langermann, Udo Kragl |
Abstract |
Ionic liquids are well known and frequently used 'designer solvents' for biocatalytic reactions. This review highlights recent achievements in the field of multiphasic ionic liquid-based reaction concepts. It covers classical biphasic systems including supported ionic liquid phases, thermo-regulated multi-component solvent systems (TMS) and polymerized ionic liquids. These powerful concepts combine unique reaction conditions with a high potential for future applications on a laboratory and industrial scale. The presence of a multiphasic system simplifies downstream processing due to the distribution of the catalyst and reactants in different phases. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 44 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 8 | 18% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 16% |
Researcher | 4 | 9% |
Other | 4 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 7% |
Other | 8 | 18% |
Unknown | 10 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Chemistry | 12 | 27% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 18% |
Chemical Engineering | 6 | 14% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 5% |
Engineering | 2 | 5% |
Other | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 13 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2018.
All research outputs
#15,506,823
of 23,045,021 outputs
Outputs from Biophysical Reviews
#344
of 799 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#208,042
of 326,468 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biophysical Reviews
#6
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,045,021 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 799 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,468 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.