You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparative analysis of riverscape genetic structure in rare, threatened and common freshwater mussels
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Genetics, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10592-015-0705-5 |
| Authors |
Heather S. Galbraith, David T. Zanatta, Chris C. Wilson |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 4% |
| Czechia | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 74 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 24 | 30% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 18% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 14% |
| Unknown | 7 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 41 | 52% |
| Environmental Science | 19 | 24% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 6% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 9 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2015.
All research outputs
#4,126,275
of 22,805,349 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Genetics
#237
of 1,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,118
of 255,028 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Genetics
#3
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,805,349 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,038 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,028 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.