↓ Skip to main content

Babesia spp. in questing ticks from eastern Poland: prevalence and species diversity

Overview of attention for article published in Parasitology Research, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
Title
Babesia spp. in questing ticks from eastern Poland: prevalence and species diversity
Published in
Parasitology Research, May 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00436-015-4529-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Angelina Wójcik-Fatla, Violetta Zając, Anna Sawczyn, Ewa Cisak, Jacek Dutkiewicz

Abstract

A total of 853 questing Ixodes ricinus males, females, and nymphs and of 582 questing Dermacentor reticulatus males and females were collected from vegetation on the territory of the Lublin province (eastern Poland). The ticks were examined for the presence of Babesia by PCR detecting part of 18S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene and nuclear small subunit rRNA (SS-rDNA) for determining of Babesia spp. and Babesia microti, respectively. The overall incidence of Babesia strains in I. ricinus ticks was 4.6 %. Three species of Babesia were identified. The prevalent species was B. microti which occurred in 2.8 % of ticks, while Babesia venatorum, Babesia divergens, and unidentified Babesia species were found at the frequency of 1.2, 0.2, and 0.3 %, respectively. Altogether, B. microti constituted 61.5 % of the total strains detected in I. ricinus, B. venatorum-25.7 %, B. divergens-5.1 %, and unidentified Babesia species-7.7 %. The prevalence of Babesia species in I. ricinus did not depend significantly on locality (χ (2) = 1.885, P = 0.390) nor on the tick stage (χ (2) = 4.874, P = 0.087). The incidence of Babesia strains in D. reticulatus ticks was 2.7 %. Two species of Babesia were identified. Again, the prevalent species was B. microti which occurred in 2.1 % of ticks, while B. canis was found in 0.7 % of ticks. In one D. reticulatus female, B. canis and B. microti co-infection was found. Altogether, B. microti constituted 75 % of the total strains detected in D. reticulatus while B. canis formed 25 % of the total strains. The frequency of the occurrence of Babesia species in D. reticulatus did not depend significantly on locality (χ (2) = 0.463, P = 0.793). The difference between the prevalence of Babesia in males and females of D. reticulatus was insignificant (P = 0.0954); nymphs were not found. The dominance of B. microti in the species composition of tick-borne Babesia found in this study was typical for eastern Europe. In conclusion, the results revealed that the population inhabiting the forested area of eastern Poland could be exposed to Babesia parasites, especially to those from the species B. microti, by a bite of I. ricinus, a competent vector of human babesiosis, and probably also by a bite of D. reticulatus whose role in the transmission of human babesiosis needs to be clarified.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Hungary 1 2%
France 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 58 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 29%
Student > Master 8 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 15 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 29%
Environmental Science 6 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 10%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 4 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 19 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2015.
All research outputs
#13,943,835
of 22,805,349 outputs
Outputs from Parasitology Research
#1,452
of 3,785 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,696
of 265,295 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasitology Research
#17
of 104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,805,349 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,785 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,295 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.