You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
CONSORT extension for reporting N-of-1 trials (CENT) 2015: Explanation and elaboration
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Medical Journal, May 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmj.h1793 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Larissa Shamseer, Margaret Sampson, Cecilia Bukutu, Christopher H Schmid, Jane Nikles, Robyn Tate, Bradley C Johnston, Deborah Zucker, William R Shadish, Richard Kravitz, Gordon Guyatt, Douglas G Altman, David Moher, Sunita Vohra |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 15% |
| United States | 3 | 8% |
| Canada | 3 | 8% |
| Australia | 2 | 5% |
| Ireland | 1 | 3% |
| Finland | 1 | 3% |
| Belgium | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 15% |
| Unknown | 14 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 51% |
| Scientists | 12 | 31% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 1% |
| Spain | 2 | 1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 134 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 29 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 14% |
| Professor | 15 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 8% |
| Other | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 31 | 22% |
| Unknown | 25 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 50 | 35% |
| Psychology | 13 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 21 | 15% |
| Unknown | 36 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2023.
All research outputs
#1,258,876
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#12,636
of 65,079 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,292
of 282,723 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#260
of 975 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 65,079 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,723 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 975 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.