| Title |
From demand response to transactive energy: state of the art
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Modern Power Systems and Clean Energy, December 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s40565-016-0256-x |
| Authors |
Sijie Chen, Chen-Ching Liu |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 322 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 320 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 67 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 55 | 17% |
| Researcher | 35 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 25 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 5% |
| Other | 37 | 11% |
| Unknown | 86 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 115 | 36% |
| Energy | 54 | 17% |
| Computer Science | 23 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 10 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 17 | 5% |
| Unknown | 99 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2018.
All research outputs
#6,500,120
of 23,045,021 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Modern Power Systems and Clean Energy
#10
of 360 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,891
of 422,223 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Modern Power Systems and Clean Energy
#1
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,045,021 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 360 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,223 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.