| Title |
Advances in critical care management of patients undergoing cardiac surgery
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, April 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-018-5182-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anders Aneman, Nicholas Brechot, Daniel Brodie, Frances Colreavy, John Fraser, Charles Gomersall, Peter McCanny, Peter Hasse Moller-Sorensen, Jukka Takala, Kamen Valchanov, Michael Vallely |
| Abstract |
Cardiac surgery has been evolving to include minimally invasive, hybrid and transcatheter techniques. Increasing patient age and medical complexity means that critical care management needs to adapt and evolve. Recent advances have occurred in several areas, including ventilation, haemodynamics and mechanical circulatory support, bleeding and coagulation, acute kidney injury, and neurological management. This narrative review describes standard care, recent advances, and future areas of research in the critical care management of patients undergoing cardiac surgery. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 5 | 10% |
| Mexico | 4 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 8% |
| United States | 4 | 8% |
| Canada | 3 | 6% |
| Italy | 2 | 4% |
| Belgium | 1 | 2% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 2% |
| Poland | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 19 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 33 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 11 | 22% |
| Scientists | 3 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 92 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 16 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 9% |
| Researcher | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 21 | 23% |
| Unknown | 27 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 46 | 50% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 1% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 31 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2018.
All research outputs
#1,369,656
of 24,451,685 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#1,222
of 5,256 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,101
of 329,956 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#50
of 116 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,451,685 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,256 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,956 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 116 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.