↓ Skip to main content

Drosophila strategies to study psychiatric disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Brain Research Bulletin, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
68 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
228 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Drosophila strategies to study psychiatric disorders
Published in
Brain Research Bulletin, September 2011
DOI 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2011.09.007
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bart van Alphen, Bruno van Swinderen

Abstract

For decades, Drosophila melanogaster has been used as a model organism to study human diseases, ranging from heart disease to cancer to neurological disorders [9]. For studying neurodegenerative diseases, Drosophila has been instrumental in understanding disease mechanisms and pathways as well as being an efficient tool in drug discovery studies. For some better-understood disorders, such as Fragile X (a mental retardation syndrome), clinical trials are being run, based in part on translational work in flies and rodents. However, Drosophila is currently less used to study psychiatric disorders such as autism, schizophrenia and attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), despite numerous discoveries of disease susceptibility genes that could be explored by reverse genetics or miss-expression studies. This deficit might be explained by (1) a lack of reliable tests to study more complex disease (endo)phenotypes in flies, (2) difficulties in translating disease symptoms into animal models and (3) the polygenetic nature of these diseases. In this review we discuss strategies to use D. melanogaster to study complex psychiatric disorders such as schizophrenia, autism and ADHD. Two common features of these diseases may be defective sleep and attention mechanisms, hence calling for better methods for quantifying and screening arousal thresholds in flies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 228 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Uganda 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 214 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 19%
Researcher 39 17%
Student > Bachelor 32 14%
Student > Master 25 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 5%
Other 35 15%
Unknown 41 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 69 30%
Neuroscience 40 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 10%
Psychology 18 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 7%
Other 20 9%
Unknown 42 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2014.
All research outputs
#15,424,518
of 25,759,158 outputs
Outputs from Brain Research Bulletin
#1,298
of 2,202 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,307
of 141,850 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brain Research Bulletin
#7
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,759,158 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,202 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 141,850 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.